RIP NHS?


Andrew Lansley, British politician and Shadow ...

Image via Wikipedia

A truly national health service as conceived in the post-war years has been tottering on the brink for a number of years.  As the previous Labour government sowed, so the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives will reap today as the NHS and Social Care Bill reaches its last stages in the House of Commons  and the Conservative Party  institute their idealised version on a market-led health service which will deliver profits into the hands of investment companies and will place efficiency above effectiveness in treatment delivery methods.

Yes, I feel bitter, very bitter. I don’t see the Labour Party hauling us out of the mess that the both the Liberal Democrats and the Conservative Parties have conspired to leave us with because the Labour Party in their previous guise very much laid the groundwork for this to be done.

I find it hard to believe the audacity and the incompetence of our political elite as they push through a hugely unpopular bill tonight but then, as I pause, I wonder if it is truly incompetence as they are ‘getting away with it’.

We have been confused by details and have been tricked into believing a ‘consultation’ process has taken place. It has taken place very much on the government’s own terms and the listening that has been done has been very selective.

I try not to have a blanket opposition to the ‘private sector’ and ‘profit-making’ in the health and social care sectors but I’ve been burnt by experience. There are some companies that may well be able to improve some aspects of service delivery and I completely accept we all need to move away from the blind public/private being good/bad depending on where you stand on the political spectrum. That’s quite hard for me to ‘get my head around’ as I feel instinctively that profit should not be made from ill-health but equally the government’s obsession with public being bad is equally short-sighted and damaging.

What really sticks is the way that Cameron has blatantly misled the country in the quest for votes. ‘No top down reorganisation of the NHS’ he said, lying openly to the nation and yet we have to accept the mishmash garbage that he is now leading through Parliament as the Health and Social Care Bill and it moves towards it’s Third Reading in the House of Commons today.

I feel angry at the way that language has been turned and stolen from us.

‘Choice’  has become a catch-word but as I have discovered through the ill-spirited and contemptuous way that ‘individual budgets’ have been delivered in social care – choice mostly a luxury of the ‘worried well’ or the more affluent middle classes – in whose ranks sit all those MPs who vote on these changes today.

Choice means very little if you are not in a group that can cost a company money rather than increase their profits.

We have been hoodwinked into believing that ‘choice’ will genuinely exist when these private companies rip up our public services to deliver profit to their shareholders? I think we should ask whose ‘choices’ is it that the government and the health companies that support then, they will be?

Let me turn to the social care sector again because that’s an area I am familiar with. I am very familiar in the ways that privatisation has worked or rather, not worked and the way that ‘choice’ has been promoted – falsely – as the achievable outcome for all end users.

The pushing of the public sector from social care delivery has decreased ‘choice’ in many instances. In the areas I’m familiar with, local authorities have been pushed out as providers of residential and home care services to be replaced by companies such as Southern Cross (RIP), Bupa, Care UK (always worth repeating that they donated to fund Andrew Lansley’s private office)  and homes have closed, block contracts have been signed to provide care at the cheapest costs which increases profits for the private companies of course and limits choice for individuals who need these services.

Anyone who claims that the roll out of personal budgets has or will change this and has increased ‘choice’ I will point to those who have capacity issues – those without family or friends to support them – those who are more marginalised have far fewer choice than the ‘mainstream’ who are able to engage in the process and that suits the government and the propaganda machine just fine.

That is what I fear for with the Health Bill (I am not sure why it’s even called the Health and Social Care Bill as Social Care is so obviously a troublesome ‘aside’ for the government).

Choice may well be nice for making decisions about which hospital is most convenient for a scan but what is being done to assist, support and advocate for those who are not able to make choices?

We are all in this together? Really? I doubt it.

As for me, I’m off to the vigil outside the Houses of Parliament tonight with my local Unison branch.

The TUC have also organised an ‘online vigil’ to oppose the passage of this Act.

And then.. to the Lords. But I will take careful note of the voting as it happens tonight. And I won’t forget.

3 thoughts on “RIP NHS?

  1. That post almost made me cry. Why ? I live in a big city. On Saturday a paltry 100 or so people turned out for a march/rally to Save the NHS. One retired NHS employee was really upset because only a couple of the over 20 people shed personally asked to come and who said they would did.
    Yesterday there was a vigil, in the city centre. Another poor turnout though everyone there worked really hard to try and wake people up. Some did wake up and were horrified at what the bill could/will mean.
    The main question asked by everone there, where was everyone else! Is everyone feeling so rich they are happy to pay for healthcare and are not bothered that many wont be able to?
    Another upset older NHS employee, who had rushed home after work and come to the vigil. No sign of any of her colleagues. She knew they knew as shed personally put up posters, and told them!
    Spoke to my brother in law, he works for NHS asked him what hed done…nothing, too busy trying to keep going service he works for, no-one at work had even mentioned the bill. He was too tired to even e mail his MP.
    Spoke to a nice American couple who passed by the vigil, he was medical Dr, and was quite clear, the NHS despite its problems and not enough funding is still te envy of the world and god help us when we end up with an american system. Even those with good jobs and insurance are not always covered for healthcare.
    Anyone remember the programme on TV couple of years ago showing huge Qs outside what looked like a shop? actually it was cancer patients in a Q for treatment from a free clinic. Fancy that ere ? Wake up everyone!!

  2. An amazing post as always. You are spot on. The vulnerable do not have “choices” in the same way as the affluent. It’s all hunky dory if you are in the Chipping Norton set. I am shocked that the Government can get away with making such huge and unfair changes.

  3. I so wish that I was a Lib Dem voter, so that I could have the pleasure of taking my vote away from them. David Cameron couldn’t have got this through without them. Maybe Shirley Williams will redeem the Lib Dems in the Lords, but I am glad that they got thrashed in the Scottish Elections in May.

Comments are closed.