BASW and SCIE may be planning to merge to form BASWCOSWSCIESWBOFEETOFIIB.
(British Association of Social Workers College of Social Work Social Care Institute of Excellence Social Work College But Only For England Even Though Our First Initial Is British)
Trips off the tongue.
Having a Scottish parent though, makes me feel marginalised by this new college, much though I approve of the name – so in the spirit of yesterday’s fiery post, I’ve decided to set up my own College.
It will be called the College of People With Social Work Qualifications and Those Who Are Studying Social Work. CPWSWQATWASSW.
Good thing I grabbed the domain name quickly and have been sitting on it for two years, biding my time.
My proposals are:-
To create a job for myself so I can move away from front line practice
To create jobs for my friends so they don’t have to actually do anything that involves social work but we can talk infinitely about what’s best for the profession.
To produce an online magazine because print is so last millennium.
To promote links with social work organisations internationally – cough cough, free trips to the Caribbean to ‘investigate’ how services work there, please.
Membership will be open to anyone who wants to join.
To set up a new set of capacibilities that will be expected of all social workers –
– these will include
– being able to type at least 40 wpm
– advocacy skills when working with oppressive management regimes
– Being able to work with Housing departments without raising your voice.
– Ensuring chocolate and biscuit supplies are constantly replenished in your place of work
– The importance of washing your own mug not using your colleague’s special kitten mug because that makes her really angry – especially if you don’t wash it up.
– Not hiding paperwork in drawers to make your desk (if you have one) look tidier.
– Never being more than one hour late for pre-arranged visits.
There will be a consultation period of one week.
Membership will be free today only but after today will rise to £10,000 per annum to pay for my living costs and trips to the Caribbean. As I don’t believe in paypal and secure transactions are overrated you can just leave your bank details in the comments below and I’ll be in touch.
Special concessionary rate for international members if they live somewhere I want to go on holiday to and can put me up free of charge for at least a week.
Irresistable, I know.
A couple of days ago, I noted a that BASW issued a press release stating that their ‘chief social worker plans gain tentative ministerial support’.
BASW (British Association of Social Workers) have been lobbying for changes in the Health and Social Care Bill to establish, among other things, the position of a ‘Chief Social Worker’.
I have to say I feel more than a little uncomfortable about this proposal. Perhaps it’s because I don’t understand it but I really don’t see how a ‘Chief Social Worker’ position would fit in to the government advisory framework. Perhaps it is a matter that the status issue troubles me. I don’t think we, as a profession and a young profession at that, need to ape the medical model of having a ‘Chief Medical Officer’ or a ‘Chief Nursing Officer’. We have a completely different function and work to different demands. I don’t want social work to become a profession that needs to ape and mimic others figuratively shouting ‘me too.. me too’ and waving its presence in the face of ministers. One of the criticisms of the medical models is the hierarchical natures of some of their professionals frameworks and if the proposals of the Social Work Reform Board are to take shape, there are going to be more creative and exciting ways to progress as a frontline practitioner other than management. But this position through the name and nature of the role seems to want to perpetuate hierarchy.
A Chief Social Worker would invariably come from a background of working with children as that is where the public perception of social work traditionally lies and possibly where the most ‘media interest’ lies. How would they be able to comment on issues affecting other service user groups with any authority? Would we need three Chief Social Workers? One for Children and Families, one for Adult Services and One for Mental Health Services? If no, who gets the ‘top job’? I think it is a testament to the death of generic social work that I am even able to ask that question but it is an important question to me as already it feels that social work in adult services and mental health is somewhat marginalised. To me, this one position would do so even more.
Is there a ‘Chief Teacher’? Is there a ‘Chief Occupational Therapist’? I’m asking because genuinely I don’t know. I don’t think there are but could be wrong. I actually see social work as far more closely allied to those professions in lots of ways than doctors and nurses and fail completely to understand how having a single identifiable officer would help.
I understood that a part of the remit of the College of Social Work, when it is established, will be to provide a conduit of communication between the government and the profession. Far better, in my mind, to have a board structure with a group of social workers with wider ranges of expertise than to have one identifiable ‘Chief Social Worker’.
Maybe I’m completely missing the point – it wouldn’t be the first time – so please do comment and tell me why I’m wrong in my scepticism at this role.
Social Work is a plural profession. Social Work is not only practiced in the public statutory sector. I would feel that it is a way of fragmented the profession further to place one ‘sector’ above others in the implementation of this role but I accept that I am one front-line practitioner who has infinitely less experience than those making these proposals. I just want to know how I would benefit from there being a Chief Social Worker and how it would help me in my practice.
I think that by begging for crumbs from Parliament we are approaching the need for the profession to grow in the wrong way. We need bottom up growth, confidence and development much more than top down legislation. For Social Work to gain the respect that we would like it to, we need to take action and support those coming into the profession to grow, be strong and to support and weed out poor front line management which instils poor values and habits and burns out enthusiastic entrants to the profession.
Social Work would have better media coverage if social workers were better supported in the entry level position and given support way beyond the first year of practice in developing more skills and being allowed to advocate and advance the cause of users of social services rather than being turned into Performance Indicator Drones. I don’t deny my own responsibility in that. I have spent the last couple of weeks madly trying to catch up with the end of financial year targets personally.
What we need to do is to draw on the idealism that we felt when we started our social work training and went through university because almost all social work students feel that. We need to think back on those wishes, hopes and dreams we had of really advocating, working to needs-led agendas and on strengths-based models with and alongside users and remotivate ourselves and re-energise our profession rather than rely on those who left the frontline behind years ago to do it for us.
Yes, it takes time. Yes, it takes effort. But it needs collective action of more of the ‘social workers like me’ to stand up and ‘be counted’. To involve ourselves in the organisations that claim to speak for us and explain why we do what we do and how our employers might help or hinder us when we do this.
For me, one of the great failings of BASW is on the local level in London (I know there are active local groups around the country) . Perhaps now is a time for local support groups of social workers to form and provide peer support for each other outside the ‘organisation’ and between ourselves. We see the growth of user support groups and carer groups. How about professional support groups – we are busy people and they don’t have to take place in a physical sense but think how useful it might be to have a resource of cross-authority or cross-borough local social workers to talk about issues affecting the profession outside the banner of a ‘membership’ organisation. We have opportunities to make connections and build ideas now that never existed in the past.
Grassroots – that’s the way to go.
So I’m asking you two things. Firstly, have I completely missed the point of a ‘Chief Social Worker’? and if so, tell me because I genuinely want to know.
Secondly – would you be interested in a network of local social workers to support each other – not related to cases or management issues – confidentiality is a big issue – but in looking at ways that we can affect the profession in a ground up way.
I have a feeling that might be an idea I come back to.
- A house divided: social work colleges split loyalties (guardian.co.uk)
Apparently in the US, March is ‘National Social Work Month’.
I know about World Social Work Day which falls on 15th March this year but I hadn’t thought about extrapolating out the joy of celebrating social work to an entire month!
The theme of the month according to the NASW (National Association of Social Workers) is that ‘Social Work Changes Futures’. Nice slogan – I wonder if it fits as well for those working in palliative care as it does for those working with young people.. I can see where they’re coming from with that though.
What will I do to celebrate National Social Work Month?
Well, I’ll tell people for a start – in the hope that it might make them leave me gifts of chocolate – (when I say people I mean colleagues at work!).
Other than that, I’ll probably just continue to plough through my work the way I always have and will always try to do – namely to be best of my ability and with my ethical codes intact.
I wonder whether a National Social Work Month would have much steam here in the UK? Somehow I doubt it. Even a day seems a bit flashy and overindulgent.
I notice that both BASW and the College of Social Work are having events to ‘celebrate’ World Social Work Day.
I’m tempted to go to the London event but it depends on whether I can persuade my manager to ‘celebrate social work’ by allowing me leave to attend!
Although National Social Work Month is a US specific ‘event’, I am going to spend just a little time to reflect on the increased opportunities we have to work and build networks of common interest across international boundaries.
Hopefully, in the near future, we (social workers, that is) won’t be reliant on a ‘College’ to promote social work – we’ll be able to do it ourselves and tell our own stories to counter some of the attitudes that have shaped negative perceptions of our profession.
We need to be proud of what we do and extend the voice of social workers at the front line through social media and social networks so we take part of the process of effecting change and making all our our futures better as well as those of the people we work with and for!
The role of social work and advocacy is, in my view and experience, increasing with the diffusion of media and communication means. We have to speak up for ourselves now and not rely on spokespeople and ‘friendly media outlets’ to do it for us.
I am more than a little frustrated that BASW (British Association of Social Workers) and the College of Social Work (in its current interim state) haven’t been able to thrash out their problems.
I’ve mentioned the background to this before and it’s certainly worth, if you are interested, reading through a long and involved thread on CareSpace – a Community Care discussion board – about the process. It goes into a fair bit of history and detail.
As a battling Front Line Footsoldier or actually more accurately a conscientious objector, to say I feel frustrated is an understatement – or rather, I feel frustrated when I have time to remember that this battle is happening. Most of the time, I’m just getting on with my work.
I have to despair of the inability of the parties to actually sit around a table. Yes, the whole momentum for setting up a College came from BASW and they feel they have been unfairly frozen out but they aren’t really doing themselves any favours outside their own goldfish bowl world at the moment.
I’m a member of BASW and I joined the Interim College as a ‘founder pre-member’. I’m curious by my nature and I strongly believe that social work needs firm representation. I am not going to jump one way or the other and my absolute ideal outcome is convergence so that there are not two different bodies.
I have been and remain a strong advocate for BASW. I’ve often extolled their collective virtues. It can seem a little insular at times though but I think that it has been so much more effective over the past few years. I am just not sure this is the right fight because it reflects badly on an organisation and by extension, the profession, that needs to show a more united front.
I am baffled by the current BASW position quite honestly. An organisation that claims to be member-led seems to be going about things in a strange way.
Yes, there was a referendum last year. I didn’t vote in it even though I was eligible because quite honestly, I didn’t understand the issues. I wanted convergence. Yes, I know that pride was damaged when SCIE rather than BASW were asked to lead on the ‘official’ setting up of the College but I suppose it was felt that BASW membership was too narrow and it would not ‘bring’ enough members. That’s, I suspect, where the link with Unison came from. It is the link with Unison which seems to have outraged BASW as they felt they were not fully consulted about this. I’m a member of Unison too, by the way, and with all my griping about them, they are coming into their own in the current climate of austerity. I am very glad to be a union member in general and a Unison member in particular.
The Council of BASW seem to have decided that the referendum last year (which achieved an overwhelming majority of ‘yes’ votes but the vote was for a British College and the turnout was roughly 5000 out of 13000 members – I assume it wasn’t only English members who voted) gave them a mandate to ‘go it alone’ and declare themselves a ‘College of Social Work’ for England only.
I’m left befuddled. I don’t quite want to walk away from BASW at this point because I do think they have a role but I don’t know how else to make my voice heard to them about the dissatisfaction that I’m feeling in the way that they have conducted themselves without asking the membership specifically on this point.
Currently, and certainly among people who have contacted me personally, either in work because they know I am a member (I’d been trying to recruit people to join in the past) or socially as I have some friends who are social workers and social work students, are without exception laughing at BASW and feel that the organisation is responsible for making the profession a laughing stock. As if we needed that
I’m sure the Interim College acted improperly by not consulting BASW more openly about the Unison deal. I’m also sure that the Interim College should have focussed on things that BASW doesn’t do rather than trying to create an equivalent but separate organisation or cornering BASW into convergence on their own terms.
But in my opinion (and I come from a view of being generally very positive about BASW) the SCIE College is winning the ‘battle for hearts and minds’ on the PR front.
BASW’s press releases strike one as tetchy and showing an unnecessary over-reliance on the legality of the name of the ‘College of Social Work’.
As the decision to ‘go it alone’ was not seemingly taken by the referendum – not least because the context for the referendum was not replicated when the action was taken – I thought I’d find out who did make this decision on my behalf, as a paying member of BASW.
They are :
Fran Fuller – Chair
Lesley McDowell – Vice Chair and Chair of Policy, Ethics and Human Rights Committee
Ronnie Barnes – Chair Finance & Human Resources Committee
Dave Harrop – England Committee
Joan Franklin – England Committee
Gerry Madden – Northern Ireland Committee
Jenni Rice – Northern Ireland Committee
Graeme Rizza – Scotland Committee
John McGowan – Scotland Committee
Keith Drury – Wales Committee
Nick Lovell – Wales Committee
Beverley Prevatt Goldstein
15 people to make a decision on the setting up of College of Social Work that is only going to be operating as such in England as that is the remit from the Social Work Taskforce. On that basis, shall we discount those who don’t practice in England as surely they wouldn’t vote on this issue that affects English members.
It’s our own, social worky ‘West Lothian question’.
So remove the Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales Committee members.
We are left with seven but it is presumptuous for me to assume that all the remaining members are English. So I looked on the GSCC register. And the SSSC register and the Care Register of Wales and the NISCC. (Wow, wouldn’t it be wonderful if you could search them all simultaneously).
Julia Wassell and Fran Fuller are registered in England. Ronnie Barnes and Matt McGregor are registered in Scotland. There are two Lesley McDowells registered in Northern Ireland (and none in England, Scotland or Wales so I’m assuming she is one of the two in NI).
I couldn’t find James Birchall or Beverley Prevatt Goldstein on any of the registers but I’ll assume that was just my poor searching and misspelling of names and getting confused between my searching of the different registers at 6am!
At best, that would give us between four and six people on the Council who would be primarily interested in English matters.
Just for the record, I’m no happier about some of the choices made to the interim board regarding representatives but, and this is a big but, they ARE an interim board. The SCIE College doesn’t actually exist yet, where BASW has a constitution and democratic process.
I completely understand why BASW felt they had to do something and couldn’t wait until the AGM in May but I think some kind of EGM might have been called for.
This feels like an all-out attack on BASW but I don’t want it to be. I just want a wider debate and understanding of the needs of the social work profession – not just BASW members – and it is crucially important to understand that BASW does not represent the majority of British or English Social Workers.
While BASW has expertise in all the areas the College wishes to promote and provide and perhaps it should have led on the setting up of the College – it wasn’t chosen and shouldn’t over-play the status that it has.
BASW after all, had many years in which to demonstrate that it was able to represent all social workers and still has a relatively small membership.
Personally, I think they should accept the mediation offer – although it means egg on their and our collective faces rather than continue to alienable and gripe about the rights to the name of ‘College of Social Work’.
As for the Interim Board, they’ve offered independent mediation. I am sure there are lots of things they should have done differently in respect to BASW but surely mediation is the place to thrash it out, rather than increasingly bitter press releases.
- The Two Colleges (fightingmonsters.wordpress.com)
- BASW vs College of Social Work (fightingmonsters.wordpress.com)
- A house divided: social work colleges split loyalties (guardian.co.uk)
- Social workers to get new professional body – or maybe two (guardian.co.uk)
I’m almost weary of this story before I start to write it to be honest. Unfortunately the story is ripe for pickings, I can’t really help but go with it.
A bit of background. (note : this is my understanding and perception of what has and is happening – if I’m wrong on the details, please correct me because I haven’t trawled through documents.. it’s just as it looks from a humble practitioner’s viewpoint).
BASW (British Association of Social Workers) has long been the professional organisation for social workers in the UK (the clue is in the name). BASW does not have a large membership. It seems to have a smaller group of mostly retired, independent or management members – lacking in front-line staff. I am a member of BASW. I have been an on-off member since being a student but I’m probably in my longest continuous stretch of membership at the moment.
They publish the British Journal of Social Work, they have an advice and representation service, they have a regular magazine but they fell short of being a trade union.
One of the things they were pressuring the government through the Social Work Taskforce was the establishment of a ‘College of Social Work’. Fine, good. Whatever. Sounded nice but I wasn’t entirely sure how it would make things different and make things better for me.
The Taskforce ran with this idea and proposed this. Negotiations began. SCIE (Social Care Institute for Excellence) was left in charge of the process and given significant amounts of money to set up a College of Social Work – but crucially, just for England rather than for the UK.
BASW seemed to feel increasingly marginalised by this process as they were only one of many partners rather than the lead partner that they had envisaged being.
There’s a lot at stake for BASW.
The College went along its merry path with BASW increasingly becoming irritated by it’s lack of leadership of the process.
Consultations took place. And then the ‘arrangement’ with Unison was made by the College. That seemed to kick off the main source of trouble.
Personally, it seems that the College development had a choice of convergence with BASW or with Unison and they picked Unison – one of the largest public sector trade unions. Unison though could deliver more members than BASW and the trade union element was one thing that the SCIE College could offer that BASW couldn’t.
BASW probably quite rightly fearing for its own existence, decided to establish herself as a ‘College of Social Work’. As of Friday, BASW is now called –
BASW – The College of Social Work
The SCIE-inspired College meanwhile sent out calls for social workers to join their own organisation in advance of it becoming an official college.
Here’s the rub.
The SCIE College says it will offer as membership services
– a magazine
– peer reviewed journal
– professional indemnity insurance and public liability insurance
– representation and employment advice via Unison
– tools and resources to use in practice
– attendance at annual conferences
– special awards
– special interest groups, forums, communities of interest
It goes on and on.
The difficulty comes when you realise that this is exactly what BASW offers apart from backing of Unison.
In response, BASW has claimed it is going to develop it’s own trade union branch just for social workers.
The difficulty is that there are over 100,000 social workers or social work students currently registered by the GSCC and BASW has 13,000 members.
The GSCC only registers people in England. BASW membership covers the UK.
Can we see a problem here? Basically the SCIE College claims that BASW doesn’t have a mandate to have the prime mover role in its version of a college and BASW retorts, well, it’s better than anyone else has.
Except Unison – who may well have a higher number of social workers as members.
That’s a slightly shady argument though. Firstly, I’m a member of both Unison and BASW. I see them as having wholly different goals.
Anyway, BASW have now renamed themselves ‘BASW – The College of Social Work’. They have registered the name ‘The College of Social Work’ and seem to be insisting that the SCIE College refrain from using that term.
There have been many exchanges of letters that very few people will actually read.
The perception of disruptiveness whether right or wrong is likely to harm BASW.
I’m not an active member. I don’t have time to be but I didn’t see this coming. I received a letter through the post on Saturday about it. It didn’t inspire me very much to keep fighting the fight.
At the moment, this ‘fight’ seems somewhat distant to me. I can understand that BASW feels excluded and is fighting for its life. I wouldn’t want to see it go – there are good people there – but it really should have been fighting this fight for decades. If it had a larger membership and had inaugurated a trade union branch ten years ago without being under the threat of extinction, it would have been in a much stronger place now.
Perhaps it is the fault of the profession of social workers for not standing up for ourselves enough.
These bodies, these organisations mill around us and claim to be speaking for us but we have so little time to speak for ourselves that we allow them to be filled with the same faces and the same almost-professional committee members and board members.
The problem with BASW that I saw is that its’ vision of social workers was set very much by ‘old schoolers’. People who practised decades ago and moved into management, independent practice or the academia – thus having time to devote to committees and policy development – leaving the front line behind them.
There needed to be more support in those first few years of post-qualification working. Something that those of us who are hardly the best-paid professionals in the world, would look at and say ‘that’s value for money’, ‘that organisation knows what it’s like FOR ME’ – not just for my manager or for my wildly experienced colleague but for me as I enter this minefield of a profession.
I can’t see that the SCIE college will be any different. They haven’t made much of an effort with the interim board members. Where are the real issues that are facing us as the profession (in adult services) slips away and has slipped away?
Where was BASW 5 and 10 years ago when we should have been challenging the orthodoxy that has led to this current malaise?
I have been impressed by the drive of BASW since Dawson took over as Chief Executive, to be honest, but it may well be too little too late as BASW is judged on past performance and current membership.
As for me, my heart says I don’t want BASW to die a death. I have a positive feeling towards the organisation. I know they want and mean well. I like the idea of a UK-wide College.
But the government has pumped money into the SCIE College. I’m also a member of Unison which has sided with the SCIE version. It may also become an issue of money. I pay a lot to be a member of BASW and Unison. My gut feeling is to prefer a social work specific trade union as I don’t feel particularly well-served by Unison but Unison does have a lot of fingers in a lot of pies. It is hard to imagine not having the backing of a strong union.
I just wanted everyone to get on but at the moment, this seems like a bit of a mess and I think I’ll just be sticking my head in the sand and will let them battle it out. We’ll see what emerges from the dust.
I say that with a very heavy heart. Problem with social workers, they are too busy working to get involved in conflicts outside the workplace and it doesn’t really do us any favours at all.
- BASW vs College of Social Work (fightingmonsters.wordpress.com)
- Social workers to get new professional body – or maybe two (guardian.co.uk)
It was with more than a little weariness that I read in Community Care that BASW (British Association of Social Workers) may be about to launch their own ‘rival’ College of Social Work having been in dispute and frozen out of the ‘official’ discussions with the embryonic ‘College of Social Work’.
My first response was sheer exasperation. I’m a member of BASW. I pay a not insignificant amount of money to them annually for that privilege and I have a generally warm feeling towards them (I wouldn’t be a member otherwise!). I don’t see them as an alternative to a union although I would actually prefer it if they were. I like the idea of a more specialist union but I’m also a member of Unison, the public sector trade union and I also pay them a not insignificant amount of money for the privilege.
A little disclosure before I continue. I’m a little miffed with Unison currently. I know their reps must be incredibly busy as jobs are going and people are being asked to take salary cuts but I’ve been trying to contact my branch officers for weeks about something at work that affects a few people – phone calls, messages, emails and haven’t even had the courtesy of a response. I must have paid them thousands of pounds over the years, have never asked for any assistance before and honestly, on the scale of things, this is a fairly minor matter and have been wholly and completely ignored. Harumph to Unison but you know, I’ll of course, keep paying. And paying.
But back to BASW and the College. BASW it seems are being steamrollered by the College and are trying to put up a fight in the form of an ‘alternate college’ plan. It is ironic seeing as BASW were so forceful in pushing for the existence of a College of Social Work in the first place.
BASW, it seems are unhappy with the deal that has been made between the College and Unison –
Under the deal, Unison will provide employee representation services to college members and the college will provide professional advice services to social workers who are Unison members.
First, I welcomed this potential merger but I do see an issue if BASW are going to be frozen out of the process.
As a lay-person, I see the potential role for a College of Social Work to be almost an exact equivalent of the services that BASW provides apart from having a statutory footing and the addition of trade union functions via Unison. It seems more than a little uncouth to push BASW out of the process.
I know that BASW don’t have a large membership base. It can seem almost cliquey at times but as a newly qualified social worker with limited money, if I had to choose between union membership and the membership of a professional body, I would go with the union membership every time just as a means of self-preservation.
That is what BASW have to face up to.
The problem is that they seem to have taken some kind of decision to split off from the process of establishing the College of Social Work. Whether they are right or wrong (and I don’t necessarily think they are wrong) there is a big problem of perception about being seen as ‘disruptive’ to the process. I can see how they might feel betrayed by the process of these different interest groups vying to positions of power. Retrospectively, I think they should have been given the lead role in the establishment of a College rather than SCIE (Social Care Institute of Excellence) but that’s all in the past now.
I say this with a heavy heart, but I’m not sure BASW can exist as an independent ‘College’ and I am not convinced that their branching off will be successful in the long run. I would have prefered a BASW-led college but I think we are now too far down the ‘other’ path.
My ‘perfect’ solution would have been some kind of mass consolidation of BASW, the College and Unison (or trade union functions by another means) but that looks nigh on impossible now.
The problem is that there are few enough social workers who are engaged with the process of actively wanting to be involved in these organisations as it is. All these bickerings will no doubt put many people off membership of ANY of the organisations. You don’t want to ‘pick the wrong one’.
These rumblings leave a nasty taste in ones mouth and may be a disincentive for people in the social work profession to become involved.
Which will lead to the same people who like ‘being on committees’ and being at the head of things – mostly managers who can give themselves time off work for these things or retired/independent members – to run the same organisations and to claim to be speaking for ‘front line social workers’ when, in fact, none of them do because the ethereal ‘front line social workers’ are way too busy working to be bothering themselves with who represents them!